We're a Baker Tilly network member
About Baker Tilly
Back to top
NVES credits and cross market opportunities
Article

NVES credits and cross market opportunities

Key points

  • NVES turns vehicle emissions into a tradeable credit, and it is triggered at import, not sale.
  • That creates an incentive to over-import low and zero emissions vehicles to build a bank of credits.
  • The next frontier is cross-market strategy, importing for compliance, then exporting surplus stock elsewhere.

Australia’s New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) has rapidly transformed vehicle emissions into a tradeable compliance currency. Under the framework, manufacturers earn credits, some of which are staggering (refer table 1 below), when the average emissions of vehicles they enter onto the Register of Approved Vehicles (RAV) fall below annual targets. While those exceeding targets can accumulate significant liabilities (refer table 2 below) that must be offset with credits or penalties. Crucially, credits are generated based on vehicles imported and entered onto the RAV, not vehicles ultimately sold to Australian consumers.  

Table 1: Top 5 Brands generating credits (units) in 2025 
Top 5 Brands generating Credits (units)  NVES Emissions 2025 
Brand   Interim Emissions Value  Credits generated valued at $50 (Gov’t penalty value)  Credits generated valued at $25 (credit traded) 
BYD   -6,282,824  $314,141,200  $157,070,600 
Toyota  -2,890,625  $144,531,250  $72,265,625 
Tesla   -2,212,093  $110,604,650  $55,302,325 
Kia   -729,698  $36,484,900  $18,242,450 
Geely  -620,233  $31,011,650  $15,505,825 

Source: 2025 NVES performance period results | New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Regulator 

Table 2:  Top 5 brands by penalties in 2025
Top 5 Brands by Penalties NVES Emissions 2025 
Brand   Interim Emissions Value  Penalty incurred at $50 (paid to the gov’t)  Penalty incurred at $25 (credit traded, hypothetical) 
Mazda   508,517 $25,425,850 $12,712,850
Nissan  215,261 $10,763,050 $5,381,525
Subaru   139,635 $6,981,750 $3,490,875
Hyundai  84,563 $4,228,150 $2,114,075
General Motors   65,855 $3,292,750 $1,646,375

Source: 2025 NVES performance period results | New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Regulator 

This design feature opens up an emerging strategic question for global automotive brands: could Australia be used not just as a sales market, but as a temporary compliance market?

Under current rules, every eligible vehicle imported and entered onto the RAV contributes to a brand’s NVES emissions calculation for that compliance year. Some of the values per unit are staggeringly high, refer table 3 below. For manufacturers with strong electric or low emissions portfolios, importing additional qualifying vehicles can generate surplus NVES units, which can be banked for future years or sold to higher emitting competitors. With NVES units effectively functioning as a carbon linked financial asset, the incentive to maximise credit generation is clear.  

Table 3: Credits generated per unit 2025
Top 10 Brands Credits per unit NVES Emissions 2025 
Brand   Credit generated at $50 penalty rate (hypothetical)  Credit generated (credit traded at $25)  Credit generated (credit traded at $10) 
Shandong Tangjun Ouling Automobile Manufacture Co., Ltd.  $10,692 $5,346 $2,138
Wuhan Lotus Cars Co., Ltd.  $8,650 $4,325 $1,730
Zheijiang Zeekr Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd  $8,631 $4,315 $1,726
Polestar Performance AB  $8,585 $4,292 $1,717
Chongqing Changan Automobile Co., Ltd.  $8,556 $4,278 $1,711
Guangzhou Xiaopeng Motors Technology Co. Ltd  $8,300 $4,150 $1,660
BYD AUTO CO. LTD  $8,103 $4,051 $1,621
Tesla, Inc.  $7,953 $3,977 $1,591
BYD AUTO INDUSTRY COMPANY LIMITED  $7,602 $3,801 $1,520
Smart Automobile Co., Ltd.  $7,575 $3,788 $1,515

Source: 2025 NVES performance period results | New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Regulator 

One potential strategy is the over importation of low or zero emissions vehicles into Australia, even where short-term local demand may not fully absorb that volume. This behaviour has already been observed in public reporting, where some manufacturers have imported materially more vehicles than they sold, accumulating NVES credits in the process. While this stock may eventually be sold domestically, the compliance benefit is realised at the point of import and RAV entry, not at the point of retail sale.  

Looking ahead, one can speculate about a more sophisticated extension of this logic: importing vehicles into Australia to generate NVES credits, then redirecting unsold units to other right-hand drive markets once compliance objectives are met. In theory, such an approach could allow manufacturers to arbitrage regulatory regimes across regions, using Australia’s NVES as a credit generation hub while still aligning global production with demand elsewhere. 

Whether this becomes viable at scale depends on several economic and market constraints. Vehicles entered onto the RAV must meet Australian Design Rules, and any subsequent export would need to comply with destination market regulations, logistics costs, and commercial transfer pricing rules. There are also regulatory integrity risks. The NVES Regulator has signalled a strong focus on transparency and market behaviour, and future reviews may adjust the point at which emissions are counted, particularly if stockpiling or cross-border reallocation undermines policy intent.  

Nonetheless, the incentives are real. NVES credits can offset future tightening targets through to 2029, when emissions thresholds become materially more stringent. For global OEMs managing portfolios across Asia Pacific, Europe and the UK, Australia’s NVES introduces a new variable into regional supply chain optimisation.  

Ultimately, the NVES was designed to accelerate cleaner vehicle supply to Australia, not to encourage regulatory arbitrage. But as with any tradable credit system, commercial ingenuity will test its boundaries. How regulators respond, and whether compliance shifts from import to point of sale in future reviews, will determine whether Australia becomes simply a destination market for cleaner cars, or a strategic node in a far more complex global emissions game.  

Annexure 1: Credits generated per unit value 2025 all brands
2025 Credits per unit valued at  $50  $25  $10 
 Shandong Tangjun Ouling Automobile Manufacture Co., Ltd.          10,692.39             5,346.20             2,138.48  
 Wuhan Lotus Cars Co., Ltd.             8,650.00             4,325.00             1,730.00  
 Zheijiang Zeekr Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd             8,630.74             4,315.37             1,726.15  
 Polestar Performance AB             8,584.81             4,292.40             1,716.96  
 Chongqing Changan Automobile Co., Ltd.             8,556.14             4,278.07             1,711.23  
 Guangzhou Xiaopeng Motors Technology Co. Ltd             8,299.75             4,149.88             1,659.95  
 BYD AUTO CO. LTD             8,102.67             4,051.34             1,620.53  
 Tesla, Inc.             7,953.16             3,976.58             1,590.63  
 BYD AUTO INDUSTRY COMPANY LIMITED             7,601.79             3,800.89             1,520.36  
 Smart Automobile Co., Ltd.             7,575.00             3,787.50             1,515.00  
 STELLANTIS (AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND) PTY LTD             7,509.82             3,754.91             1,501.96  
 DONGFENG LIUZHOU MOTOR CO., LTD.             7,275.00             3,637.50             1,455.00  
 Zhejiang Geely Automobile Co., Ltd.             6,697.98             3,348.99             1,339.60  
 GAC International Co., Ltd.             4,219.21             2,109.61                 843.84  
 SEAT, S.A.             4,115.01             2,057.50                 823.00  
 STELLANTIS EUROPE S.P.A             3,042.72             1,521.36                 608.54  
 Volvo Car Corporation             2,179.26             1,089.63                 435.85  
 Stellantis Auto SAS             1,742.29                 871.15                 348.46  
 Volkswagen AG             1,606.98                 803.49                 321.40  
 SKODA AUTO a.s.             1,490.87                 745.44                 298.17  
 TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION AUSTRALIA LIMITED             1,251.31                 625.65                 250.26  
 Automobili Lamborghini S.P.A.             1,189.55                 594.78                 237.91  
 Bentley Motors Limited             1,157.41                 578.70                 231.48  
 B M W AUSTRALIA LTD.             1,100.94                 550.47                 220.19  
 Ford Werke GmbH             1,050.43                 525.21                 210.09  
 McLaren Automotive Ltd                 990.48                 495.24                 198.10  
 Renault s.a.s                 903.10                 451.55                 180.62  
 Chery Automobile Co., Ltd                 711.40                 355.70                 142.28  
 Kia Motors Corporation                 705.27                 352.63                 141.05  
 SAIC Motor Corporation Limited                 699.49                 349.75                 139.90  
 Great Wall Motor Company Limited                 683.07                 341.54                 136.61  
 Suzuki Motor Corporation                 636.69                 318.35                 127.34  
 Isuzu Motors Limited                 612.04                 306.02                 122.41  
 MERCEDES-BENZ AUSTRALIA/PACIFIC PTY LTD                 581.74                 290.87                 116.35  
 FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD                 553.00                 276.50                 110.60  
 Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Corp., Ltd/ JAC MOTORS                 433.53                 216.77                    86.71  
 Beiqi Foton Motor Co. Ltd.                 295.88                 147.94                    59.18  
 Ford Motor Company                 151.97                    75.99                    30.39  
 Audi AG                 135.28                    67.64                    27.06  
 MITSUBISHI MOTORS AUSTRALIA LIMITED                 117.24                    58.62                    23.45  

Source: 2025 NVES performance period results | New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Regulator 


This content is general commentary only and does not constitute advice. Before making any decision or taking any action in relation to the content, you should consult your professional advisor. To the maximum extent permitted by law, neither Pitcher Partners or its affiliated entities, nor any of our employees will be liable for any loss, damage, liability or claim whatsoever suffered or incurred arising directly or indirectly out of the use or reliance on the material contained in this content. Pitcher Partners is an association of independent firms. Pitcher Partners is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Limited, the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

Pitcher Partners insights

Get the latest Pitcher Partners updates direct to your inbox

Thank you for you interest

How can we help you?

Business or personal advice
General information
Career information
Media enquiries
Contact expert
Become a member
Specialist query
Please provide as much detail to ensure appropriate allocation of your query
Please highlight a realistic time frame that will enable us to provide advice within a suitable and timely manner. Please note given conflicting demands with our senior personnel, we will endeavour to respond to you within the nominated time frame. If you require an urgent response, please contact us on 03 8610 5477.
Responses to queries submitted via this form (“Response”) are produced by Pitcher Partners Advisors Proprietary Limited and are prepared for the exclusive use and benefit of those who are invited, and agree, to participate in the CRITICAL POINT NETWORK service. Responses provided, or any part thereof, must not be distributed, copied, used, or relied on by any other person, without our prior written consent. Any information provided is intended to be of a general nature and prepared without taking into account your objectives, circumstances, financial situation or particular needs. Any information provided does not constitute personal advice. If you act on anything contained in a Response without seeking personal advice you do so at your own risk. In providing this information, we are not purporting to act as solicitors or provide legal advice. Any information provided by us is prepared in the ordinary course of our profession and is based on the relevant law and its interpretations by relevant authorities as it stands at the time the information is provided. Any changes or modifications to the law and/or its interpretation after this time could affect the information we provide. It is not possible to guarantee that the tax authorities will not challenge a transaction or to guarantee the outcome of such a challenge if one is raised on the basis of the information we provide. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Pitcher Partners will not be liable for any loss, damage, liability or claim whatsoever suffered or incurred by any person arising directly or indirectly out of the use or reliance on the information contained within a Response. We recommend you seek a formal engagement of our professional services to consider the appropriateness of the information in a Response having regard to your objectives, circumstances, financial situation or needs before proceeding with any financial decisions. Pitcher Partners is an association of independent firms. Pitcher Partners is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Limited, the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.
CPN Enquiry
Business Radar 2025
Dealmakers 2025
Not-for-profit survey 2025
Search by industry